<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Market Structure Map &#187; NYSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/tag/nyse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://modernir.com/msm</link>
	<description>Helping IROs understand short-term market structure to maintain long-term peace of mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nov 30-Dec 4: On the NYSE and Knight Floors</title>
		<link>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/12/08/41/</link>
		<comments>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/12/08/41/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>msm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSM Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebate trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modernir.com/msm/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denver is an icebox, so we went east to New York to warm up. Lovely here, the tree glittering at Rockefeller Center and the snowflakes magically materializing to music on the Saks &#38; Co. façade. Festive!
Carmen Barone and the Barclays team graciously hosted me yesterday on the NYSE trading floor, and in the afternoon Marge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denver is an icebox, so we went east to New York to warm up. Lovely here, the tree glittering at Rockefeller Center and the snowflakes magically materializing to music on the Saks &amp; Co. façade. Festive!</p>
<p>Carmen Barone and the Barclays team graciously hosted me yesterday on the NYSE trading floor, and in the afternoon Marge Wywras at Knight Capital Group turned me loose with the traders on the Knight floor in Jersey City. That’s darned near a perfect business day to me.<span id="more-41"></span>In reporting back to you on findings important to the IR chair, number one, floor operations play a crucial role still. These specialists, now called <a title="NYSE Euronext DMMs" href="http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/fact_sheet_dmm.pdf" target="_blank">Designated Market Makers</a>, are required to support issuers by actively placing bids and offers and committing their own financial resources. By wading into the stream of liquidity, 98% of which is automated on sophisticated mathematical systems, DMMs stabilize prices and help to foster orderly markets. Traders roam the floor with handheld devices controlling a variety of algorithmic options for working orders, which they deploy based on market conditions and customer preferences. They may follow the market, aim to affect a certain percentage of volume, aggressively push for alpha, and trade on a time-weighted or volume-weighted basis.</p>
<p>The floor revenue model has changed. Brokers are paid by the NYSE to provide liquidity, a form of rebate trading, which we’ve written about before. Just as grocery stores give out coupons to encourage customers to shop, rebates help exchanges and market centers attract liquidity from buyers and sellers, who then generate transactional revenue and data-services fees. The NYSE is supporting the DMMs by letting them collect fees that might otherwise go to super-fast market-neutral platforms, the high-frequency traders who own nothing and risk little in order to sit between buyers and sellers and churn shares back and forth.</p>
<p>The NYSE is stabilizing at some 25-30% share of traded volume now, down from the 85% (in listed issues) it enjoyed before the 2006 changes, but an improvement over recent pressure. The irony is that in an era of transparency, even the floor traders don’t know a great deal about the source and nature of the volume with which they interact. But they know a whole lot more than most. Our advice to issuers: make good use of their valuable access to market information.</p>
<p>My good friend Marge Wyrwas offered some eye-opening peeks behind the deceptively quiet façade of the building housing Knight Capital Group’s sleek trading operations. Wow. The floor is sliced up into sections providing sales trading, listed and Nasdaq equity trading strategies, ETF execution, bond trading, currency trading and even a new carbon trading operation. Billions of shares trade here every day. The degree with which Knight can knife through the maze and craze of equity trading and manage the execution of trades is really something to see. Two key takeaways: they do more real volume and less high-frequency trading than many think. And they blend the marvel of human insights with the magic of ultra-modern algo technology.</p>
<p>Personally, I was pleased to see again that we’re keeping right up with what’s happening. In fact, we’re tracking and clustering executed order flow to uniquely capture the nature and origin of liquidity in way that’s not being done, even at that trading level.</p>
<p>Why does all this matter? The IR role is an information role. Become the expert on market structure at your company and redefine the way IR is measured. It’s valuable to your management team, and cool to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/12/08/41/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oct 12-16: What We Should Do With Dark Pools</title>
		<link>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/10/20/oct-12-16-what-we-should-do-with-dark-pools/</link>
		<comments>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/10/20/oct-12-16-what-we-should-do-with-dark-pools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>msm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSM Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high frequency trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modernir.com/msm/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A word on the markets: options expired last week, while swaps and counterparty agreements pegged to volatility measures lapse tomorrow. Speculation and risk management trading are high as a result. If you expect your stock to behave as though everybody buying and selling it acts on fundamentals, you’ll encounter the unexpected.
The NYSE and Charles Schumer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word on the markets: options expired last week, while swaps and counterparty agreements pegged to volatility measures lapse tomorrow. Speculation and risk management trading are high as a result. If you expect your stock to behave as though everybody buying and selling it acts on fundamentals, you’ll encounter the unexpected.</p>
<p>The NYSE and Charles Schumer were talking today about rules for dark pools. The NYSE is partnered with dark-pool operator Liquidnet and is building a massive high-speed trading facility in New Jersey. The Nasdaq meanwhile plans to launch an exchange next year that will give priority to orders of size, to compete with the size advantage dark-pool operators offer.</p>
<p><span id="more-21"></span>What’s going on here? Politics, mostly. We’ve <a title="High-frequency Trading Can Be Troublesome" href="http://www.denverpost.com/headlines/ci_13554764" target="_blank">said plenty</a> about this stuff. But the regulators – and IR folks too we fear – continue to misunderstand the central issue. The IR profession is about supporting capital formation and fostering productive, creative enterprises. At the rate we’re going, none of us will have jobs. If trading things is an end unto itself, why bother with all that work to start and run companies? Take your idea to a broker, have them issue an exchanged traded note representing your idea, hire an accounting firm to handle regulatory and financial reporting, and that’s all you need. Traders, have fun!</p>
<p>We’re being obtuse. But dark pools are like black markets. Black markets form in response to price controls. We can go back to the order-handling rule in 1996 in which the SEC set out to “create better pricing opportunity.”</p>
<p>Come forward to Reg NMS. It was a legitimate effort to minimize market arbitrage, but it in effect is a gigantic price control. It says that all trades (there are exceptions but stay with us here) must execute at the best national bid or offer. That’s like pouring Niagara Falls through a funnel. You have literally millions of different prices trying to match up for securities, but trades can only execute, simplistically, at that one best price. That supposes that all buyers and sellers have only one thing in mind: price. If that were the case with cars, we’d all drive Tata Nanos.</p>
<p>Dark pools formed to serve audiences that wanted something more than the best price at this split second in time without regard to supply. Who uses them? Mostly big institutions wanting to move sizeable amounts of shares without interference by parties with other objectives such as speculation, rebate-capture, high-frequency trading and risk-management.</p>
<p>What’s the response from regulators? To clamp down on dark pools.</p>
<p>We’re oversimplifying. And we have good friends running high-frequency trading platforms. We mean no offense to anyone. But the problem in our equity markets is that they’re efficient for parties that want the best price and which don’t want to commit capital and own things.</p>
<p>But they’re very inefficient for capital formation. In 1996, 675 companies IPO’d in US markets with prices over $5. In 2008, 21 such companies debuted here. Money has shifted to private equity by the trillions, and to international markets with fewer price controls.</p>
<p>This had better matter to us more than anyone else. This is our profession. Let’s defend it, rather than slice our collective noses off to spite our faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://modernir.com/msm/index.php/2009/10/20/oct-12-16-what-we-should-do-with-dark-pools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
