September 20, 2011

Datafeed Speed and Market Structure

If you absolutely must have trading data fast, who’s your huckleberry?

Burstream, apparently. The firm claims it can serve up actionable, meaningful trading data, no matter what market mayhem, in 600 nanoseconds. That’s 600 billionths of a second. The catch? You have to trade at the Nasdaq.

Burstream’s system is being installed at the Nasdaq OMX market center in New Jersey so the exchange’s important proprietary-trading customers will have a split-second – taken to the extreme – advantage. Customers wanting to use these superfast capabilities will be able to load their algorithms onto Burstream servers parked next to boxes housing the Nasdaq’s trade-matching engines.

Burstream systems will go near the Chicago Mercantile Exchange too. The idea is to unify data streams on stocks, commodities and derivatives so decisions about trading on divergence can be made faster than ever before possible. This is, of course, arbitrage.

Burstream says at its website: “Enable your high frequency trading algorithms to hit liquidity when it is revealed. Trade through market bursts while competitors exit the market. Sustained nanosecond speeds, even during message bursts will give your latency-sensitive algorithms a performance advantage.”

What makes Burstream special is its use of field-programmable gate-array chips (FPGAs) that can perform multiple calculations simultaneously, thus delivering a speed advantage over conventional hardware-processing techniques.

We have clients in the FPGA design and manufacturing businesses whose shares are publicly traded on the Nasdaq. IR pros may appreciate the irony. Companies who use the public markets to raise capital and build growth enterprises are being arbitraged via nanosecond data at the exchange that lists their shares.

We don’t fault the exchange per se. Exchanges are for-profit businesses today. They earn money by capturing a share of the quote and trade data on the consolidated tape. The amount is determined by how often securities at their market centers (most have more than one) quote or trade close to the National Best Bid or Offer. Thus, liquidity providers like Merrill Lynch, Instinet and Morgan Stanley are paid to quote at the Nasdaq. Payments come in the form of trading rebates for posting shares at the Nasdaq that offset against fees for removing them.

If the Nasdaq can speed up trading and arbitrage, more data are generated, more trades and quotes. It’s a virtuous circle: pay liquidity providers like Merrrill and Morgan to make sure liquidity exists. Encourage arbitrage with the fastest data systems to hit it. Capture more quotes and trades. Monetize consolidated-tape data. Repeat.

This is how exchanges generally work today. While rational investment is one behavior, it’s small today (and it does not re-price shares in nanoseconds). For obvious reasons. If you think about it.

Share this article:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More posts

dreamstime l 67819586
February 28, 2024

Two things exploded in 2023.  Trading in options contracts and illegal US immigration. No, I’m not suggesting they’re correlated!  I note it bemusedly. But I...

dreamstime l 20057394
February 21, 2024

Last week, markets were abuzz over the zero that lifted LYFT.  For those who were vacationing or living hermetically and missed it, Lyft reported financial...

dreamstime m 206876446
February 14, 2024

I’ve got my Valentine, for which I’m grateful every day.  Whether the market finds love after yesterday’s blood remains to be seen. Back when the...

dreamstime m 212403964
February 7, 2024

On Nov 15, 2021, NVDA closed at $345.30 on a hundred million shares of volume. Without context, that information is interesting but unhelpful.  I’d note...

dreamstime l 24803177
January 31, 2024

Consumers are confident. I’m not sure they have all the data. It’s a lesson for public companies. In case you missed it, The Conference Board’s...

dreamstime l 56087804
January 24, 2024

If I said the name “Sherlock Holmes” to you, what’s your snap response? Probably, “Elementary, my dear Watson.” I have long favored a line by...