March 30, 2010

Market Structure in 3D

Show me examples.

When I was a fresh-faced goofy college kid, my Logic professor, who was Greek and credible with his Hellenic accent, would say that a thing was theory only until you provided examples in the real world.

We hear that notion regularly. “So what exactly do you see with market structure? Give us some examples.” You asked. We’re doing it. We’ll aim to give you them regularly. Each will be an actual, real-world example, though the confidential nature of the data we track may preclude names.

As background, we’re clustering trading volumes behaviorally. It’s not quantitative analysis, which follows price and volume. It’s sorting out volumes with different time horizons and purposes to see which kind is prevailing. Often, price and volume change little, while behind the scenes tumult ensues among parties trading for different time horizons and purposes.

Here’s an example: Two large technology companies engaged in a bidding war for a third company. One of the two bidders was our client. There are three basic dimensions to market structure: trade executions driven by rational investment theses; trades for risk-management purposes based on changing market information, economic data or portfolio risk; and speculation in which traders take the other sides of trades, or sit between buyers and sellers to capitalize on short-term price movement or liquidity fluctuation.

Speculators are the truth-tellers about rumors and deals. If outcomes are uncertain, the parties most likely to know are the ones whose whole business it is to figure such things out. They’re not always right, but their batting average in our experience is over 80%. We pay attention.

In this instance, we saw 100% uniformity in speculators’ conclusions about the deal. How? They all did exactly the same thing. Literally no arbitrager questioned the prevailing sentiment.

For the IRO, that’s powerful data to present to boards and management teams. “Market structure indicates that the market universally expects us to prevail.” That says two things: Either your business and resources are more potent than your competitor’s, or you had better prevail or be prepared to suffer a high price. As a kicker, the IR team also could tell the Board and management that stock price was unlikely to change much at conclusion of the deal. Such was the outcome.

These are the things we see every day with market structure analytics.

Share this article:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Get the Latest News Deliverd to your Inbox

More posts

dreamstime m 138166
August 19, 2026

Earnings.  This is what the stock market is all about.  That’s what we’re told all day long by the financial media. And it would be...

dreamstime m 23642565
August 12, 2026

Would you take a coin flip as an outcome? I got to know a successful growth fund manager in the 1990s. Well. More than one!...

dreamstime m 19006712
August 5, 2026

Very slowly than all at once is how things tend to happen. It seems to be true in the stock market. A Demand/Supply view of...

dreamstime m 69568570
July 29, 2026

Because there aren’t enough ways to trade, single-stock futures are back. On July 27, the CME launched single-stock futures valued at 100 shares each on...

dreamstime m 20795956
July 22, 2026

My dad wanted to be buried in a pine box on a hillside. Our friend Kim did it. A “natural burial” puts nothing between the...

dreamstime m 60636703
July 15, 2026

Whatever you write, do it as though somebody will read it back to you in a court of law. I can’t recall who passed that...