March 30, 2010

Market Structure in 3D

Show me examples.

When I was a fresh-faced goofy college kid, my Logic professor, who was Greek and credible with his Hellenic accent, would say that a thing was theory only until you provided examples in the real world.

We hear that notion regularly. “So what exactly do you see with market structure? Give us some examples.” You asked. We’re doing it. We’ll aim to give you them regularly. Each will be an actual, real-world example, though the confidential nature of the data we track may preclude names.

As background, we’re clustering trading volumes behaviorally. It’s not quantitative analysis, which follows price and volume. It’s sorting out volumes with different time horizons and purposes to see which kind is prevailing. Often, price and volume change little, while behind the scenes tumult ensues among parties trading for different time horizons and purposes.

Here’s an example: Two large technology companies engaged in a bidding war for a third company. One of the two bidders was our client. There are three basic dimensions to market structure: trade executions driven by rational investment theses; trades for risk-management purposes based on changing market information, economic data or portfolio risk; and speculation in which traders take the other sides of trades, or sit between buyers and sellers to capitalize on short-term price movement or liquidity fluctuation.

Speculators are the truth-tellers about rumors and deals. If outcomes are uncertain, the parties most likely to know are the ones whose whole business it is to figure such things out. They’re not always right, but their batting average in our experience is over 80%. We pay attention.

In this instance, we saw 100% uniformity in speculators’ conclusions about the deal. How? They all did exactly the same thing. Literally no arbitrager questioned the prevailing sentiment.

For the IRO, that’s powerful data to present to boards and management teams. “Market structure indicates that the market universally expects us to prevail.” That says two things: Either your business and resources are more potent than your competitor’s, or you had better prevail or be prepared to suffer a high price. As a kicker, the IR team also could tell the Board and management that stock price was unlikely to change much at conclusion of the deal. Such was the outcome.

These are the things we see every day with market structure analytics.

Share this article:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Get the Latest News Deliverd to your Inbox

More posts

dreamstime m 42576539
October 7, 2026

The Pinta landed in the bay of Baiona alongside the castle of Monterreal on Mar 1, 1493. Those of you who learned that Christopher Columbus...

dreamstime m 102328582 (1)
September 30, 2026

EDITORIAL NOTE: If you’re reading this edition of the blog and it feels, as Yogi Berra would say, like deja vu all over again, it’s...

dreamstime m 60636703
September 23, 2026

EDITORIAL NOTE: Queridos leitores! Portuguese is a hard language (well, not if you’re Portuguese). So dear readers, this is a Best of the ModernIR blog...

dreamstime m 304833296
September 16, 2026

Trading nearly around the clock will change how you report earnings, public companies. Thursday, I’ll be the last panelist in the final session of the...

dreamstime m 167984305
September 9, 2026

ChargePoint (CHPT) traded 44 million shares Sep 3, almost twice its ledger of 24 million, and rose from around $5 to over $9. Yes, in...

dreamstime m 7424008
September 2, 2026

Soon we’ll be rocking around the clock.  Which raises the question: Does 24-hour trading foster capital formation? By the way, I’ve been invited to sit...