November 1, 2011

The Peterffy Effect and High-Frequency Trading

Having never gone to a Neighborhood Pumpkin-Carving, we were wistful when squirrels promptly devoured the face off our finished product (marked “easiest” in the booklet of pumpkin-carving patterns we purchased). Ah well. What some consider a jack-o-lantern others see as a meal.

Speaking of scary, for those keeping record we note more currency-driven events to explain to your executives. First, the European Central Bank last week threw down the red carpet for Greek lenders, so the dollar dived and stocks soared on changes to perceived risk and anticipated further global currency-printing. On Halloween, Japan intervened to weaken the yen by buying other currencies, so the dollar strengthened (less supply, same demand) and markets plunged. On Nov 1, fear of setbacks on the Greece deal drove risk managers back to the dollar, pushing it up and stocks down more.

US markets should be proxies for fundamental value and forward multiples of collective corporate cash flows. Not meters for currency fluctuations. Happy Halloween.

Speaking of meters, there is Tom Peterffy, immigrant, billionaire, and architect of automated trading. Peterffy ranked 236th on Forbes’ list of the 400 richest in 2009, fruits of long labor revolutionizing how stocks trade. Peterffy, founder of Timber Hill and Interactive Brokers, pioneers in automated multi-asset-class electronic trading, believes automated trading goes too far.

Peterffy told Wall Street Journal reporter Scott Patterson in an October 20 story that automated trading has made markets less efficient and less safe. That’s akin to the inventor of a major heart medication pronouncing the compound dangerous to one’s heart.

Peterffy led the charge a decade ago to bring mathematics and machines to the process of matching trades. If investors needed to buy and sell shares, computers that picked and plucked from all over to fill orders for spreads at fractions of the old levels meant something was always on the other side of the trade. Liquid markets.

But they’re not liquid. They just have lots of volume. Liquidity suggests substance. And there’s the problem for the IR chair. Each market day now is a microcosm, an entire trading universe, the whole life cycle of industries boiled down to a single day’s activity. You make investments, hedge them, leverage them and trade the ramifications for currencies and bonds of growth and contraction. For a day. Start fresh the next day.

In this world, companies should hold four conference calls daily to update investors. Well, that’s absurd. It’s confusing busy with productive, exactly what low-spread markets do. The essence of human commercial interaction should not come down by regulatory edict to the spread on a trade.

See you Thursday at the NYSE for the IR Magazine Think Tank! Catch me at a table and we’ll kick this idea of one-day markets around.

Share this article:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More posts

dreamstime l 779123
January 14, 2026

Should the Federal Reserve be independent?  Depending on how you count, the enumerated powers of the United States government in Article I Section 8 of...

dreamstime l 165518220
January 7, 2026

If we need more proof that the stock market is an autonomous system, look no further than a rally on the “Donroe Doctrine,” as some...

dreamstime l 153419812
December 17, 2025

The market isn’t really the market. Yesterday, I told Diane King Hall on Schwab Network that futures are no crystal ball. Cracked myself up with...

dreamstime l 7462204
December 10, 2025

I don’t know if it’s better to be the Wildebeest or the Hyena. But there’s safety in the herd. That’s one conclusion from my NIRI...

dreamstime l 62060641
December 3, 2025

Where is the money coming from? It’s the question Karen and I had down in Cabo ahead of Thanksgiving as we observed the hillsides overlooking...

dreamstime l 159387318 (1)
November 26, 2025

We bid November 2025 goodbye and we say hello to a tryptophan high (yes, that rhymes on purpose). You EDGE subscribers, our next live Discussion...