November 26, 2014

Best-of: From Aug 27, 2014 – Beyond Curiosity

Happy Thanksgiving from Austin, TX!  Many of you are out too, seeing family for the holiday. Looking back at 2014, this Market Structure Map from Aug 27 was one of the year’s most widely read. Curiously, some of the same economic data points including the FHFA house-price index and the Case-Schiller Home Price Index were out this week again. 

If we know how many mortgage applications were filed last week, public companies should know what set their stock prices last week too. Every public company deserves good information about the equity market, and it’s not cooler to “just run the business and ignore the stock.” That would be like “just drive the car and ignore the fuel gauge.” Catch you after Thanksgiving!  -TQ


Aug 27: Beyond Curiosity


Let’s talk about houses.

Let me explain. Twice yesterday I encountered an issue, not a new one though. We were discussing it on a conference call too, preparing for a market-structure session Sept 9 at the NIRI Southwest Regional Conference here in Denver – which if you care about market structure is not to be missed. A highlight, Rajeev Ranjan, central banker with the Chicago Federal Reserve and former algo trader, will explain why the Fed cares whether high-speed traders are gaming equities and derivatives.

Anyway, what issue am I talking about?  I continue to hear executives and investor-relations officers say, “I don’t see why short-term trading matters when we’re focused on long-term investors.”

I hear some of you groaning.  “Quast,” you moan. “We don’t want to keep hearing the same stuff.”  I get that. If you already know the answer, you can cut out of the Market Structure Map early today.  Catch you next week.

The rest of you, if you’ve got a tickling there in the back of your head like a sneeze forming in the nose that you really don’t want the CFO to ask you why market structure matters, then let’s talk about houses.

Big money tracks residential real estate – houses. Just this week we had or will have reports on new home sales, the Federal Home Financing Administration’s housing index, the Case-Shiller Home Price Index, mortgage applications, and pending home sales. Decisions about construction, banking, credit-extension and more depend on these data.  They’re part of certain GDP components.

Now suppose it was unclear who was buying and selling houses, whether the sales were cash or financed, how much of the volume of new and existing home-sales were simply transactions between brokers trying to pump up volumes (suppose it were half!), whether mortgage applications were real or indications of interest that wouldn’t materialize, and 35% of all home-sales were in the dark with nothing more known about them save the net number.

We’d be outraged.  This condition could imperil not only the economy but the global payments system backed by government policies and the Federal Reserve. Nobody would know the actual supply or demand of houses, or whether prices were real or a figment of intermediary imaginations. The real money would leave. The sector would be a casino.

You see where I’m going. We depend on the equity market to provide some proxy on the economy and the movement of investment capital.  Yet 85% of it isn’t fundamental. It’s intermediation, asset-allocation, risk-hedging, things that can change in a heartbeat.  It’s such a big deal that The Fed and Congress are concerned.  And public companies aren’t?

Suppose you sold widgets through dealers. What if you had no idea who consumed the widgets or how they were used?  How would you market to customers? What metrics would you use to form future investment and hiring plans? How would you tell your widget story to investors, if you were a publicly traded widget-maker?  “We have no idea who buys them, but we’re really happy with volumes.”

That would be crazy.  So why isn’t it in the equity market?

The average public company’s net ownership change in a given quarter is about 3/63 of the volume for the quarter. Or if you prefer, a central tendency of 1/21, which is not statistically significant. Which consumers are driving the 20/21 of volume you’re not seeing in ownership data?

We’d never stand for this condition in any other market, period. So why is it okay in the $23 trillion stock market, upon which hinges almost everything of importance in the USA, from our individual net worth to the stability of the financial system?

That’s more than a curiosity. Knowing (and we do and can know, actually) should be of paramount importance and spearheaded by IROs and public companies. We don’t want to be the shrugging observers here.

Share this article:

More posts

dreamstime m 99921172
April 10, 2024

You wonder what’s going to happen next. I mean, look around.  The South Carolina women ran ruthlessly through everyone, capping a 38-0 season with the...

dreamstime l 27136185
April 3, 2024

Is impending volatility predictable?  Sherlock Holmes would not tell Watson it’s elementary, that’s for sure.  But there is a tale behind the tape. Permit me...

dreamstime m 105967603
March 27, 2024

Vanguard founder Jack Bogle said to own the averages. Index funds.  That seed germinated into a tree that filled the investment world. Look at Blackrock....

dreamstime m 6563143
March 20, 2024

I was walking up Steamboat Springs’s Emerald Mountain with my friend Charlie last week and he said, “Trading volatility is like trading air.”  Charlie was...

dreamstime m 5149030
March 13, 2024

My wife Karen is reading Peter Attia’s book, Outlive, which is like reading it myself. I get the benefit of Karen as filter for tidbits...

dreamstime m 66699772
March 6, 2024

What the…? Everything was awesome. Monday. Then yesterday, stocks toppled like a thawed corpse in Nederland (inside joke, there). No obvious reason. Some said it was...